The Anthropogenic Climate Change Scam

There is important scientific evidence that disagrees with the left leaning promulgation of greenhouse gas caused climate change.

"Climate scientists need there to be a problem in order to get funding" -- Dr Roy Spencer

Dr. Roy Spencer is a principal research scientist for the University of Alabama in Huntsville, as well as the U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA’s Aqua satellite.  He is known for his work with the satellite-based temperature monitoring for which he and Dr. John Christy received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal [Wikipedia]. 

Dr. Spencer suggests that global warming is mostly due to natural internal variability, and that the climate system is quite insensitive to humanity’s greenhouse gas emissions.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dr. Wie-Hock “Willie” Soon of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics says the Sun is a primary driver of climate change — and has a far greater impact than changes in CO_2.  Further, climate science is corrupted and co-opted by multiple non-scientific forces.  The movement toward renewable energy source, is not a sign of progress, but regression toward the lower energy densities of the pre-industrial age.

For all the focus on carbon dioxide, the most important greenhouse gas in the climate system is water vapor. And carbon dioxide is not a “pollutant,” as the term is conventionally used.

While it was true that the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide had been increasing and had passed 400 parts per million, the dominant effect of water vapor had helped flatten the greenhouse effect, such that the rise of global surface temperatures had slowed significantly.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This debate was always about left-wing ideology, quasi-religious hysteria, and "follow the money" corruption, never about "science" -- James Delingpole, journalist

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Renewable energy can't do the job. Government should switch green subsidies into R&D" -- Bill Gates

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
Carbon dioxide is a trace gas that constitutes only about 0.04 percent of earth's total atmosphere. That's just four 100th's of one percent! Concentration is expressed in parts per million. As of Spring 2015 levels were at 401.5 ppm. CO2 is just one of many atmospheric gases. Common sense dictates that such a tiny amount of gas cannot be having any major impact on temperatures.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 CO2 is vital for plant life. At current levels, plants are on a starvation CO2 diet. Global warming alarmists claim that species will become extinct if the planet warms. In reality warmer weather has increased biodiversity. Yet politicians, the media and alarmists have portrayed CO2 as a pollutant.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Follow the money

Thousands of scientists are being paid handsomely to find a connection between human carbon emissions and the climate. Hardly any have been paid to debunk anthropogenic global warming. Much of the debunking work is left to grass roots volunteers.

 

From 1989 until 2009 the U.S. government spent more than $32.5 billion on climate studies. They additionally spent another $79 billion on climate change related technology research, foreign aid and tax breaks for "green energy."

Grant-seeking scientists and others can get very rich from a career in global warming. If you put global warming in your article or research proposal then you qualify for a lucrative government research grant!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"There doesn’t necessarily need to be a conspiracy. It doesn’t require any centrally coordinated deceit or covert instructions to operate. Instead it’s the lack of funding for the alternatives that leaves a vacuum and creates a systemic failure. The force of monopolistic funding works like a ratchet mechanism on science. Results can move in both directions, but the funding means that only results from one side of the equation get traction."

-- Science and Public Policy Institute

 

Again, follow the money.  Since a Global Warming/Climate Change Crisis event is an excellent opportunity for Centralized Government Regulation/Control, those who develop proof and imminence of the event will get a large portion of available Government funding. This leads to a scam of unprecedented scale.

Compiled by Pete Nickerson
 2020 09 15

Where life begins

I feel I really need to say a word about life.  Does life begin at conception or does life begin when the baby draws its first breath?  This is a question that has been thrown out in recent arguments about abortion. If an unborn child’s inability to breathe on its own disqualifies it from being considered a living person, there is a very bad extension that can be drawn.

There are times where, through traumatic event or disease a person, regardless of age, may become unable to breathe on their own and must be given the benefit of artificial ventilation to provide their lungs with life giving air for preservation of their life.

But if ability to breathe is the determining factor, once a person stops breathing should further efforts to save that life be with-held because the definition of life is now a person’s ability to draw their own breath.

Almost everyone will agree that everything should be done to save that life.  We have developed emotional attachments to this person and we do not want to lose them.  So if we can do anything to preserve their lives we will try to save them.

Even if the person in distress is a total stranger, we recognize that person as a living human being, so the fact that they have stopped breathing will not deter us from trying to save their life.

Should we not recognize the unborn child also as a person?

Scare Tactis

What is the best way to control people?

You need to convince them that if they don’t do what you want them to do it will lead to their total annihilation.  What could be scarier than that?

How do you convince them?

You tell them that the consensus (97% or maybe even more) of experts (scientists) agree that they need to change their ways (to what you want them to do) or they will suffer dire consequences due to their own inaction.  Of course if some scientists do not agree you will just tell the people that those scientists have been discredited or have no standing in this field of knowledge.  

If you say a lie loud enough and long enough many people will begin to believe you.  This is called the “BIG LIE”.  In the 20^th century the big lie was used to convince many people that socialism/communism was the savior of humanity.  Many people bought it.  However socialism has always allowed people not to share the wealth but share the misery.  Many people point to some European Countries where socialism has succeeded but on closer examination we see that these countries, when they started to suffer extreme monetary crisis, have pulled back from complete socialism and re-instituted private businesses.  They still retain some socialistic structures but have regained a thriving private sector.

So when you see scare tactics being used to convince you to accept a certain course of action, be wary of the Big Lie.

Fix for our broken Congress

I believe that the Congress should be subject to Term Limits 

(2 for Senators and 3 for Representatives).  

I further believe that they need to retire on Social Security 

and whatever other plan is available to the working public (i.e.  401k plans, etc.) 

and that they need to be subject to any law they pass for the Citizens of this Country, 

for they are, after all, Citizens, not Royalty.

The Value of a Border Wall

Israel has several border walls separating its territories from some of its neighbors. Historically, Israel has experienced several international attacks from countries who feel that Israel should not exist as a country in that area.  For Israel the walls are not the only part of the solution, but they are effective a very important part of their border security.

Here are some other countries who have constructed walls to help protect themselves from their neighbors:  

India, Pakistan, Ukraine, Turkmenistan, China, Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, Iran, 

Costa Rica, Maylaysia, Botswana, United Arab Emirates, Slovenia, Belize, South Africa, Kuwait, Hungary, Estonia, Kazakstan, Hungary, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Brunei, Egypt.

And we should not forget the wall constructed by North Korea, though we are not sure that wall is meant to keep South Koreans out or keep the North Koreans in.

While a Border Wall with Mexico would not give us total security, it is clear that it is a very important part of our border security strategy. 

Is America Great?

If not for us, all of Europe would be speaking German today and all of Asia, including China, Thailand, Maylasia, Borneo, Singapore, Indonesia, New Guinea, Bali, East Timor and a good portion of Australia would be speaking Japanese. 

Of course that does not account for our greatness today. That has been thrown away by Liberal/Progressive Causes which have weakened our leadership in the world. We have now regained some of that leadership.  These gains are, however, opposed by those same Liberal/Progressive Forces who say we must keep our borders open and be kinder to our enemies. If we don't offend them maybe they will go easy on us. We are like the one in the water that hopes the sharks will eat us last.  We must stand strong and reaffirm our willingness to stand up to derision and defamation.  We must continue to strive for the resolve to make this country great again. 

Open borders is not a solution.  (Look at what is happening in France, Germany and other European nations that opened their borders to allow the immigration of cheap labor.)  We must be able to ensure that those who come to this country wish to be here as a part of American society and contribute their efforts to this country’s strength.  We must be able to control the numbers of immigrants so they do not overwhelm our ability to absorb them.  They must not come here to take what they can in benefits while waving the flag of the country they left.  The lesson of the Roman Empire is glaring – Rome fell when it failed to protect its borders.

A weak military is also not a solution.  There are other nations of the world who would use their strengths to subdue other nations by force or the threat of force.  They would carve off portions of their neighbors land or areas of international seas for political or strategic gain.  We are not out to conquer land or other nations.  From a position of strength we have acted, not as conquerors, but as protectors of the free world.    

Is America great?  From my point of view we are regaining that position, but we can not rest on our laurels.  We need to continue with those efforts we are making to solidify our position at home and on the world stage. We can not look at ourselves as separate from the rest of the world but as a strong and independent player in the future of international affairs. 

Understanding Global Climate Change

Global Climate Change Understood

The issue of Global Climate Change is often misunderstood.  A better understanding to the phenomena may bring some long over-due sanity to the discussion.

In the geologic history of the Earth, we are in a time of the coldest 10 percent of the climate. In other words, 90 percent of our Earth’s history was too warm to have ice at either pole.

If you go back to the Roman warming periods during the time that Jesus Christ walked the Earth we are actually now cooler than we were then. So we’ve cooled since the time Jesus Christ walked the Earth. We’re actually about the same temperature or cooler since the medieval warm period, since about 900 to 1300.

Thermometer data comes online around 1850, right at the end of the Little Ice Age.  All these things you hear about the glaciers retreating, most of that glacier retreat happened by 1900.

Now, 80 percent of the carbon dioxide came after 1940, or after World War II in 1945. We had a huge warm spell from the 1920s into the ’30s and then, we had a cooling period from the ’50s all the way up to about the late 1970s.

The National Academy of Sciences, the CIA, and some of the same scientists warning of global cooling in the ’70s, then flipped and became global warming proponents.

I remember warnings of the coming Ice Age when I was in elementary school in the late 1950s.

There are many factors affecting GCC (Global Climate Change). 
The most talked about contributing factor is the amount of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere.  Atmospheric CO₂ is a byproduct of the use of fossil fuels, but also is released into the atmosphere in huge amounts by volcanic activity and, to a lesser degree, by continental drift.
Solar activity such as Sun Spots, Flares and UVB levels are also contributing factors. 
Slow changes in the Earth’s orbit and slight changes in the tilt of Earth’s axis will affect GCC as well.
Atmospheric composition and reflectivity as well as surface reflectivity are also factors that affect GCC.

Why then is Atmospheric CO₂ the only factor in the discussion.  The answer is simply because we have been lead to believe that by controlling anthropomorphic CO₂ emissions we can control the Earth’s climate.  This is a vast over simplification but, if accepted, it can be used as a very strong political tool. 

Political action (legislation) is needed to control the use of fossil fuels so we can control the amount of CO₂ released into the atmosphere.  Since there are also natural CO₂ generators, this is pure folly.  Further, as mentioned above, Atmospheric CO₂ is only one factor involved in Global Climate Change, so controlling anthropomorphic (man-made) CO₂ emissions would do little at all to control Global Climate Change.

So what can we do?  Global Climate Change will continue no matter what we do, so we can, and must, adapt our actions and way of life to meet whatever changes it brings on, just like our ancestors have been doing for as long as Humanity has been on this Earth.