The Anthropogenic Climate Change Scam
There is important scientific evidence that disagrees with the left leaning
promulgation of greenhouse gas caused climate change.
"Climate
scientists need there to be a problem in order to get funding" -- Dr Roy Spencer
Dr. Roy
Spencer is
a principal research scientist for the University of Alabama in Huntsville, as
well as the U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning
Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA’s Aqua satellite. He is known for his work
with the satellite-based temperature monitoring for which he and Dr. John
Christy received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal [Wikipedia].
Dr.
Spencer suggests that global warming is mostly due to natural internal
variability, and that the climate system is quite insensitive
to humanity’s greenhouse gas emissions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Wie-Hock “Willie” Soon of
the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics says the Sun is a primary
driver of climate change — and has a far greater impact than changes in CO2. Further, climate science is corrupted and
co-opted by multiple non-scientific forces.
The movement toward renewable energy source, is not a sign of progress,
but regression toward the lower energy densities of the pre-industrial age.
For all the focus on carbon dioxide, the most important greenhouse gas in the
climate system is water vapor. And carbon dioxide is not a “pollutant,” as the
term is conventionally used.
While it was true that the atmospheric
concentration of carbon dioxide had been increasing and had passed 400 parts
per million, the dominant effect of water vapor had helped flatten the
greenhouse effect, such that the rise of global surface temperatures had slowed
significantly.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This
debate was always about left-wing ideology, quasi-religious hysteria, and
"follow the money" corruption, never about "science" -- James Delingpole,
journalist
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Renewable
energy can't do the job. Government should switch green subsidies into
R&D" -- Bill Gates
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
Carbon dioxide is a trace gas that constitutes
only about 0.04 percent of earth's total atmosphere. That's just four 100th's
of one percent! Concentration is expressed in parts per million. As of Spring 2015 levels were at 401.5 ppm. CO2 is just
one of many atmospheric gases. Common sense dictates that such a tiny amount of
gas cannot be having any major impact on temperatures.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CO2 is vital for plant life. At current levels, plants
are on a starvation CO2 diet. Global warming alarmists claim that species will
become extinct if the planet warms. In reality warmer weather has increased biodiversity. Yet politicians, the
media and alarmists have portrayed CO2 as a pollutant.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Follow the money
Thousands of scientists are
being paid handsomely to find a connection between human carbon emissions and
the climate. Hardly any have been paid to debunk anthropogenic global warming.
Much of the debunking work is left to grass roots volunteers.
From 1989 until 2009 the
U.S. government spent more than $32.5 billion on
climate studies. They additionally spent another $79 billion on climate change
related technology research, foreign aid and tax breaks for "green
energy."
Grant-seeking scientists and others can get very rich from a career in global
warming. If you put global warming in your article or research proposal then
you qualify for a lucrative government research grant!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"There doesn’t
necessarily need to be a conspiracy. It doesn’t require any centrally coordinated
deceit or covert instructions to operate. Instead it’s the lack of funding for
the alternatives that leaves a vacuum and creates a systemic failure. The force
of monopolistic funding works like a ratchet mechanism on science. Results can
move in both directions, but the funding means that only results from one side
of the equation get traction."
-- Science and Public Policy
Institute
Again, follow the money. Since a Global Warming/Climate Change Crisis
event is an excellent opportunity for Centralized Government Regulation/Control,
those who develop proof and imminence of the event will get a large portion of
available Government funding. This leads to a scam of unprecedented scale.
Compiled by Pete Nickerson
2020 09 15
