I feel I really need to say
a word about life. Does life begin at
conception or does life begin when the baby draws its first breath? This is a question that has been thrown out
in recent arguments about abortion. If an unborn child’s inability to breathe
on its own disqualifies it from being considered a living person, there is a
very bad extension that can be drawn.
There are times where, through traumatic event or disease a person, regardless
of age, may become unable to breathe on their own and must be given the benefit
of artificial ventilation to provide their lungs with life giving air for
preservation of their life.
But if ability to breathe is the determining factor, once a person stops
breathing should further efforts to save that life be with-held because the
definition of life is now a person’s ability to draw their own breath.
Almost everyone will agree that everything should be done to save that
life. We have developed emotional
attachments to this person and we do not want to lose them. So if we can do anything to preserve their
lives we will try to save them.
Even if the person in distress is a total stranger, we recognize that person as
a living human being, so the fact that they have stopped breathing will not
deter us from trying to save their life.
Should we not recognize the unborn child also as a person?
Tuesday, September 10, 2019
Sunday, March 17, 2019
Scare Tactis
What is the best way to control people?
You need to convince them that if they don’t do what you want them to do it
will lead to their total annihilation.
What could be scarier than that?
How do you convince them?
You tell them that the consensus (97% or maybe even more) of experts
(scientists) agree that they need to change their ways (to what you want them
to do) or they will suffer dire consequences due to their own inaction. Of course if some scientists do not agree you
will just tell the people that those scientists have been discredited or have
no standing in this field of knowledge.
If you say a lie loud enough and long enough many people will begin to believe
you. This is called the “BIG LIE”. In the 20th century the big lie
was used to convince many people that socialism/communism was the savior of
humanity. Many people bought it. However socialism has always allowed people
not to share the wealth but share the misery.
Many people point to some European Countries where socialism has
succeeded but on closer examination we see that these countries, when they
started to suffer extreme monetary crisis, have pulled back from complete
socialism and re-instituted private businesses.
They still retain some socialistic structures but have regained a
thriving private sector.
So when you see scare tactics being used to convince you to accept a certain
course of action, be wary of the Big Lie.
Saturday, February 2, 2019
Fix for our broken Congress
I believe that the Congress should be subject to
Term Limits
(2 for Senators and 3 for Representatives).
I further believe that they need to retire on Social Security
and whatever other plan is available to the working public (i.e. 401k plans, etc.)
and that they need to be subject to any law they pass for the Citizens of this Country,
for they are, after all, Citizens, not Royalty.
Friday, December 28, 2018
The Value of a Border Wall
Israel has several border walls separating its territories from some of
its neighbors. Historically, Israel has experienced several international
attacks from countries who feel that Israel should not exist as a country in that
area. For Israel the walls are not the
only part of the solution, but they are effective a very important part of
their border security.
Here are some other countries who have constructed walls to help protect
themselves from their neighbors:
India, Pakistan, Ukraine, Turkmenistan, China, Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, Iran,
Costa Rica, Maylaysia, Botswana, United Arab Emirates, Slovenia, Belize, South
Africa, Kuwait, Hungary, Estonia, Kazakstan, Hungary, Macedonia, Bulgaria,
Brunei, Egypt.
And we should not forget the wall constructed by North Korea, though we are not
sure that wall is meant to keep South Koreans out or keep the North Koreans in.
While a Border Wall with Mexico would not give us total security, it is clear that it is a very important part of our border security strategy.
While a Border Wall with Mexico would not give us total security, it is clear that it is a very important part of our border security strategy.
Friday, December 14, 2018
Is America Great?
If not for us, all of Europe would be speaking German today and all of Asia, including China, Thailand, Maylasia, Borneo, Singapore, Indonesia, New Guinea, Bali, East Timor and a good portion of Australia would be speaking Japanese.
Of course that does not account for our greatness today. That has been thrown away by Liberal/Progressive Causes which have weakened our leadership in the world. We have now regained some of that leadership. These gains are, however, opposed by those same Liberal/Progressive Forces who say we must keep our borders open and be kinder to our enemies. If we don't offend them maybe they will go easy on us. We are like the one in the water that hopes the sharks will eat us last. We must stand strong and reaffirm our willingness to stand up to derision and defamation. We must continue to strive for the resolve to make this country great again.
Open borders is not a solution. (Look at what is happening in France, Germany and other European nations that opened their borders to allow the immigration of cheap labor.) We must be able to ensure that those who come to this country wish to be here as a part of American society and contribute their efforts to this country’s strength. We must be able to control the numbers of immigrants so they do not overwhelm our ability to absorb them. They must not come here to take what they can in benefits while waving the flag of the country they left. The lesson of the Roman Empire is glaring – Rome fell when it failed to protect its borders.
A weak military is also not a solution. There are other nations of the world who would use their strengths to subdue other nations by force or the threat of force. They would carve off portions of their neighbors land or areas of international seas for political or strategic gain. We are not out to conquer land or other nations. From a position of strength we have acted, not as conquerors, but as protectors of the free world.
Is America great? From my point of view we are regaining that position, but we can not rest on our laurels. We need to continue with those efforts we are making to solidify our position at home and on the world stage. We can not look at ourselves as separate from the rest of the world but as a strong and independent player in the future of international affairs.
Saturday, November 17, 2018
Understanding Global Climate Change
Global Climate Change Understood
The issue of Global Climate Change is often misunderstood. A better understanding to the phenomena may bring some long over-due sanity to the discussion.
In the geologic history of the Earth, we are in a time of the coldest 10 percent of the climate. In other words, 90 percent of our Earth’s history was too warm to have ice at either pole.
If you go back to the Roman warming periods during the time that Jesus Christ walked the Earth we are actually now cooler than we were then. So we’ve cooled since the time Jesus Christ walked the Earth. We’re actually about the same temperature or cooler since the medieval warm period, since about 900 to 1300.
Thermometer data comes online around 1850, right at the end of the Little Ice Age. All these things you hear about the glaciers retreating, most of that glacier retreat happened by 1900.
Now, 80 percent of the carbon dioxide came after 1940, or after World War II in 1945. We had a huge warm spell from the 1920s into the ’30s and then, we had a cooling period from the ’50s all the way up to about the late 1970s.
The National Academy of Sciences, the CIA, and some of the same scientists warning of global cooling in the ’70s, then flipped and became global warming proponents.
I remember warnings of the coming Ice Age when I was in elementary school in the late 1950s.
There are many factors affecting GCC (Global Climate Change).
The most talked about contributing factor is the amount of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere. Atmospheric CO2 is a byproduct of the use of fossil fuels, but also is released into the atmosphere in huge amounts by volcanic activity and, to a lesser degree, by continental drift.
Solar activity such as Sun Spots, Flares and UVB levels are also contributing factors.
Slow changes in the Earth’s orbit and slight changes in the tilt of Earth’s axis will affect GCC as well.
Atmospheric composition and reflectivity as well as surface reflectivity are also factors that affect GCC.
Why then is Atmospheric CO2 the only factor in the discussion. The answer is simply because we have been lead to believe that by controlling anthropomorphic CO2 emissions we can control the Earth’s climate. This is a vast over simplification but, if accepted, it can be used as a very strong political tool.
Political action (legislation) is needed to control the use of fossil fuels so we can control the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere. Since there are also natural CO2 generators, this is pure folly. Further, as mentioned above, Atmospheric CO2 is only one factor involved in Global Climate Change, so controlling anthropomorphic (man-made) CO2 emissions would do little at all to control Global Climate Change.
So what can we do? Global Climate Change will continue no matter what we do, so we can, and must, adapt our actions and way of life to meet whatever changes it brings on, just like our ancestors have been doing for as long as Humanity has been on this Earth.
The issue of Global Climate Change is often misunderstood. A better understanding to the phenomena may bring some long over-due sanity to the discussion.
In the geologic history of the Earth, we are in a time of the coldest 10 percent of the climate. In other words, 90 percent of our Earth’s history was too warm to have ice at either pole.
If you go back to the Roman warming periods during the time that Jesus Christ walked the Earth we are actually now cooler than we were then. So we’ve cooled since the time Jesus Christ walked the Earth. We’re actually about the same temperature or cooler since the medieval warm period, since about 900 to 1300.
Thermometer data comes online around 1850, right at the end of the Little Ice Age. All these things you hear about the glaciers retreating, most of that glacier retreat happened by 1900.
Now, 80 percent of the carbon dioxide came after 1940, or after World War II in 1945. We had a huge warm spell from the 1920s into the ’30s and then, we had a cooling period from the ’50s all the way up to about the late 1970s.
The National Academy of Sciences, the CIA, and some of the same scientists warning of global cooling in the ’70s, then flipped and became global warming proponents.
I remember warnings of the coming Ice Age when I was in elementary school in the late 1950s.
There are many factors affecting GCC (Global Climate Change).
The most talked about contributing factor is the amount of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere. Atmospheric CO2 is a byproduct of the use of fossil fuels, but also is released into the atmosphere in huge amounts by volcanic activity and, to a lesser degree, by continental drift.
Solar activity such as Sun Spots, Flares and UVB levels are also contributing factors.
Slow changes in the Earth’s orbit and slight changes in the tilt of Earth’s axis will affect GCC as well.
Atmospheric composition and reflectivity as well as surface reflectivity are also factors that affect GCC.
Why then is Atmospheric CO2 the only factor in the discussion. The answer is simply because we have been lead to believe that by controlling anthropomorphic CO2 emissions we can control the Earth’s climate. This is a vast over simplification but, if accepted, it can be used as a very strong political tool.
Political action (legislation) is needed to control the use of fossil fuels so we can control the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere. Since there are also natural CO2 generators, this is pure folly. Further, as mentioned above, Atmospheric CO2 is only one factor involved in Global Climate Change, so controlling anthropomorphic (man-made) CO2 emissions would do little at all to control Global Climate Change.
So what can we do? Global Climate Change will continue no matter what we do, so we can, and must, adapt our actions and way of life to meet whatever changes it brings on, just like our ancestors have been doing for as long as Humanity has been on this Earth.
Thursday, June 9, 2016
By His Grace
By His Grace
I am so grateful to my Lord for a lifetime of blessings.
He made the hurts and pain bearable,
He took sadness and gave me joy,
He taught me the greatest lessons in life.
When I surrender to His will I am never afraid.
He is my protector and shield and my source of strength.
I pray that I always stay mindful of His glory.
Pete Nickerson
6/9/2016
I am so grateful to my Lord for a lifetime of blessings.
He made the hurts and pain bearable,
He took sadness and gave me joy,
He taught me the greatest lessons in life.
When I surrender to His will I am never afraid.
He is my protector and shield and my source of strength.
I pray that I always stay mindful of His glory.
Pete Nickerson
6/9/2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)